Kuroma Kuroma

synaptica.global scores 72/100 for AI Readiness

Synaptica (synaptica.global) is a Data & Analytics site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 72/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (82) and its weakest is Authority Signals (65); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 42/100 (15 of 770 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.). That places it in the top quartile of the 3099 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://synaptica.global

72/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3099 audited sites in Technology

Is synaptica.global ready for AI search?

Largely yes: synaptica.global scores 72/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Optimize Heading Structure.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 82
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 67
Authority Signals 25% of the score 65
AI Readiness 30% of the score 74

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.6 pts

    On https://synaptica.global · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 65/100

    • 25 of 57 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • This page opens 9 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://synaptica.global · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3 pts

    On https://synaptica.global · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 42/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +2.6 pts

    On https://synaptica.global · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 65/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +2.5 pts

    On https://synaptica.global · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 45/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 15934 words, 357 paragraphs, 34 lists, 61 images (56 with alt text)

    • 5 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 34 question headings. 10 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    43 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, ProfessionalService, Service, BlogPosting, BreadcrumbList

  • AI Readability Score Pass 82/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 106 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 80/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 9, H2: 114, H3: 59. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (9) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 48/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 32 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Synaptica", "AI Tutora", "AI Insurance").
    • 52 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    42 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    6 render-blocking resources. 2679 elements for 15934 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 65/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 25 placeholder links

    • 25 of 57 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 64/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 10/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    17 external links, 0 citation phrases, 17 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 77/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 88/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    192 of 257 headings open a quotable passage, 40 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 65/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 9 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 89/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 4/24/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 42/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    15 of 770 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 75/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 75/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    15934 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Data & Analytics · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai