Kuroma Kuroma

ecovadis.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

EcoVadis (ecovadis.com) is a Data & Analytics site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is On-Page Content (48); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 6/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 152 Data & Analytics sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://ecovadis.com

64/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Data & Analytics Median 48.5 · Top quartile 54 · across 152 audited sites in Data & Analytics

Is ecovadis.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: ecovadis.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 48
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 80
Authority Signals 25% of the score 67
AI Readiness 30% of the score 65

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://ecovadis.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.1 pts

    On https://ecovadis.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://ecovadis.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.3 pts

    On https://ecovadis.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 35/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3 pts

    On https://ecovadis.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 77/100

    • 9 of 227 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • 1 AI visibility crawler(s) blocked in robots.txt: OAI-SearchBot. Blocking these removes the site from the corresponding AI engines' answers.
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …
    • This page opens 83 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Allow AI visibility crawlers (OAI-SearchBot) in robots.txt so the site can appear in AI search answers

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 85/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1624 words, 22 paragraphs, 26 lists, 87 images (5 with alt text)

    • 82 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 6/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 90/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 97/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 21. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Fail 18/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 73 of 78 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("ChatGPT AI", "Gemini AI", "Perplexity AI").
    • 66 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 78 images but only ~1624 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    13 render-blocking resources. 1282 elements for 1624 words

    • 13 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 69 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 77/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. 1 AI crawler(s) blocked: OAI-SearchBot. 9 placeholder links

    • 9 of 227 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • 1 AI visibility crawler(s) blocked in robots.txt: OAI-SearchBot. Blocking these removes the site from the corresponding AI engines' answers.
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 61/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 14/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 10 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 83/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 60/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    17 of 30 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 70/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    2 original data indicators, 6 percentages, 13 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 75/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 6/3/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 35/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    7 of 132 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1624 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Data & Analytics · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai