Kuroma Kuroma

kx.com scores 71/100 for AI Readiness

kx.com is a Data & Analytics site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 71/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is On-Page Content (62); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 3099 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://kx.com

71/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3099 audited sites in Technology

Is kx.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: kx.com scores 71/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 62
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 73
AI Readiness 30% of the score 70

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.2 pts

    On https://kx.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 35/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.6 pts

    On https://kx.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 49/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.3 pts

    On https://kx.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 27/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://kx.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +2.7 pts

    On https://kx.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 63/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
    • Add FAQ section with common questions about your topic

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 4166 words, 171 paragraphs, 37 lists, 69 images (27 with alt text)

    • 42 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 35/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 27/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 11 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 95/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 15, H3: 34. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 42 of 69 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 16 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("English flag", "Japanese flag", "KX Logo").
    • 44 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    19 render-blocking resources. 2989 elements for 4166 words

    • 19 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 83/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 18 placeholder links

    • 18 of 235 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 49/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 22/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    19 external links, 0 citation phrases, 8 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 96/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 63/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    29 of 73 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 77/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    3 original data indicators, 7 percentages, 2 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 92/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/16/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 56/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    8 of 290 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 6 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Data & Analytics · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai