Kuroma Kuroma

guidewire.com scores 55/100 for AI Readiness

P&C Insurance Software & Technology (guidewire.com) is a InsurTech / Insurance site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 55/100 (grade B), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (86) and its weakest is AI Readiness (39); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 22/100 (0 original data indicators, 7 percentages, 0 quotes.).

Audited URL: https://guidewire.com

55/100
Grade
B

This audit is 36 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 36 days ago

Is guidewire.com ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: guidewire.com scores 55/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 56
Technical Optimization 86
Authority Signals 48
AI Readiness 39

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 87/100

    Found: 1048 words, 64 paragraphs, 35 lists, 58 images (47 with alt text)

    • 11 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 23/100

    No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 83/100

    Average 10 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 82/100

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 14. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 40/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 11 of 55 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Image", "Image") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 18 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("search icon", "PricingCenter Logo", "PricingCenter Logo").
    • 20 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 91/100

    2 render-blocking resources. 1165 elements for 1048 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 58/100

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 93/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 35/100

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 4/10. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 45/100

    3 external links, 0 citation phrases, 9 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 61/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links

AI Readiness

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited InsurTech / Insurance sites

Other InsurTech / Insurance sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.