Kuroma Kuroma

creatordb.app scores 61/100 for AI Readiness

CreatorDB (creatordb.app) is a MarTech / Marketing Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 61/100 (grade A), audited 29 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is AI Readiness (50); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 291 MarTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://creatordb.app

61/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Structured Data Quality: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.7% of the total, which takes 6.7 points off the overall score.

Updated 3 days ago

Top 25% in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 59 · across 291 audited sites in MarTech

Is creatordb.app ready for AI search?

Largely yes: creatordb.app scores 61/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 62
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 80
Authority Signals 25% of the score 59
AI Readiness 30% of the score 50

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +6.7 pts

    On https://creatordb.app · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://creatordb.app · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.8 pts

    On https://creatordb.app · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 31/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +4.4 pts

    On https://creatordb.app · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 23/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://creatordb.app · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 1,524 words, 36 paragraphs, 6 lists, 3 images (2 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text (e.g. /assets/video/hero-banner-poster.jpg)
  • Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 9 questions detected in content

  • 6.7% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, BreadcrumbList, Service, SoftwareApplication, Dataset, VideoObject, Review, FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 1. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("CreatorDB", "CreatorDB").

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 442 elements for 1,524 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • 13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links

    • 7 of 75 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 31/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 77/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    9 of 12 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 23/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 12/1/2025

    • No recent year references in content
    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 55/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    5 of 72 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 75/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 75/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1,524 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited MarTech / Marketing Platform sites

Other MarTech / Marketing Platform sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.