Kuroma Kuroma

creatordb.app scores 54/100 for AI Readiness

CreatorDB (creatordb.app) is a MarTech / Marketing Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 54/100 (grade B), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (75) and its weakest is AI Readiness (41); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar).

Audited URL: https://creatordb.app

54/100
Grade
B

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is creatordb.app ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: creatordb.app scores 54/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 61
Technical Optimization 75
Authority Signals 46
AI Readiness 41

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 82/100

    Found: 1363 words, 36 paragraphs, 6 lists, 3 images (2 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text (e.g. /assets/video/hero-banner-poster.jpg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 9 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, BreadcrumbList, Service, SoftwareApplication, Dataset, VideoObject, Review, FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 1. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("CreatorDB", "CreatorDB").

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    1 render-blocking resources. 360 elements for 1363 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 71/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links

    • 7 of 59 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 33/100

    4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 75/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 65/100

    1 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 53/100

    References current year. Last modified: 12/1/2025

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 10/100

    1 of 69 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 85/100

    Score: 85/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1363 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited MarTech / Marketing Platform sites

Other MarTech / Marketing Platform sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.