Kuroma Kuroma

www.instagram.com scores 49/100 for AI Readiness

www.instagram.com is a Travel / Hospitality site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 49/100 (grade C), audited 23 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (88) and its weakest is On-Page Content (26); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No JSON-LD structured data found).

Audited URL: https://www.instagram.com/radiant_haven27?igsh=MTRjYThmODFwOWs5eQ==

49/100
Grade
C

This audit is 55 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 55 days ago

Is www.instagram.com ready for AI search?

Partly: www.instagram.com scores 49/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 26
Technical Optimization 88
Authority Signals 41
AI Readiness 49

The 16 checks this audit confirms it scored

Every check this audit confirms it scored, with what it found on the page. 3 other checks are listed without a share of the score, because this audit cannot confirm whether they counted on this page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 2704 words

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    FAQ section found (no schema). 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No JSON-LD structured data found
  • AI Readability Score Needs work 45/100

    Average 1 words/sentence. 15 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 0/100

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
  • Media Accessibility Pass 85/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Fetch succeeded with an acceptable response time

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • Meta robots noarchive/nocache directive detected. Bing documents that NOARCHIVE prevents content from being used in Copilot responses and grounding results.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 20/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9 external links, 1 citation phrases, 365 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 33/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Social Links

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • 0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 42/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 65/100

    References current year

    • No article publish/modified dates in metadata
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 70/100

    30 unique value phrases, 23 differentiators, 1 case study mentions.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 74/100

    Score: 74/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    2704 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Travel / Hospitality sites

Other Travel / Hospitality sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.