Kuroma Kuroma

cloudbeds.com scores 69/100 for AI Readiness

#1 Award-Winning Hospitality Management System (cloudbeds.com) is a Travel / Hospitality site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (75) and its weakest is Technical Optimization (54); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 20/100 (2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, SoftwareApplication). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,784 Travel / Hospitality sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://cloudbeds.com

69/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 47/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 6.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Travel / Hospitality Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,784 audited sites in Travel / Hospitality

Is cloudbeds.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: cloudbeds.com scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 75
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 54
Authority Signals 25% of the score 72
AI Readiness 30% of the score 71

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.9 pts

    On https://cloudbeds.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 47/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 8 of 232 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at cloudbeds.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 98 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://cloudbeds.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.6 pts

    On https://cloudbeds.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://cloudbeds.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.5 pts

    On https://cloudbeds.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 64/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3664 words, 160 paragraphs, 13 lists, 80 images (51 with alt text)

    • 29 images missing alt text (e.g. /wp-content/uploads/2025/09/rectangle5-68ba240521a3d.webp, /wp-content/uploads/2026/03/header-image-right.webp , /wp-content/uploads/2026/05/OG-compass-spring.png)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 88/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 8 question headings. 8 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, SoftwareApplication

  • AI Readability Score Pass 94/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 21 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 11, H3: 8. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 45/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 29 of 80 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Vipul-Dayal.jpeg") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 23 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("cloudbeds", "cloudbeds", "Bespoke Hotels").
    • 40 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    20 render-blocking resources. 1835 elements for 3664 words

    • 20 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 47/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 8 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 8 of 232 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at cloudbeds.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 64/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 27 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 79/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 76/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    16 of 20 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 24 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/24/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 55/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    13 of 224 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3664 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Travel / Hospitality sites

Other Travel / Hospitality sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.