Kuroma Kuroma

rategain.com scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

Travel and Hotel Software (rategain.com) is a Travel / Hospitality site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Authority Signals (71) and its weakest is AI Readiness (61); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 79 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,681 Travel / Hospitality sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://rategain.com

66/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Structured Data Quality: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.7% of the total, which takes 6.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Travel / Hospitality Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,681 audited sites in Travel / Hospitality

Is rategain.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: rategain.com scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Raw HTML Availability.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 67
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 67
Authority Signals 25% of the score 71
AI Readiness 30% of the score 61

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +6.7 pts

    On https://rategain.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 79 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.1 pts

    On https://rategain.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 61/100

    • 82 of 656 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing
    • This page opens 77 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • robots.txt asks crawlers to wait 20s between requests, which limits how much of this site they reach
  3. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.7 pts

    On https://rategain.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 49/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 14 of your 43 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.2 pts

    On https://rategain.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 55/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3 pts

    On https://rategain.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 60/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 3475 words, 50 paragraphs, 127 lists, 162 images (57 with alt text)

    • 105 images missing alt text
  • Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 6.7% of the overall score

    5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, ItemList

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 79 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 92/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 1, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 105 of 162 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 6 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Instagram-02.jpg", "Logo", "Logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 23 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Vietjet-banner", "MicrosoftTeams-image (4)", "Yatra").
    • 20 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    5 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    139 render-blocking resources. 5007 elements for 3475 words

    • 139 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 86 responsive images

  • 13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 82 placeholder links

    • 82 of 656 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 55/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 25/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    293 external links, 0 citation phrases, 28 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    14 of 43 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 60/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    2 original data indicators, 23 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 92/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 57/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    14 of 238 passages carry a figure, 4 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 62/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 62/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Travel / Hospitality sites

Other Travel / Hospitality sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.