Kuroma Kuroma

azoom.jp scores 43/100 for AI Readiness

azoom.jp is a PropTech / Real Estate site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 43/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (54) and its weakest is Authority Signals (34); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it above the median of the 394 PropTech / Real Estate sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://azoom.jp

43/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 45/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.2 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Above the median in PropTech / Real Estate Median 40 · Top quartile 45 · across 394 audited sites in PropTech / Real Estate

Is azoom.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: azoom.jp scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 48
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 54
Authority Signals 25% of the score 34
AI Readiness 30% of the score 39

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.2 pts

    On https://azoom.jp · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 45/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • The response at azoom.jp is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 60 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at azoom.jp — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://azoom.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://azoom.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://azoom.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +5.5 pts

    On https://azoom.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 39/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 85/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,679 words, 2 paragraphs, 33 lists, 25 images (25 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 14 words/sentence. 9 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 62/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 2, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 39/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 16 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("不動産", "Adwall", "Adwall_popup").
    • 17 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 2 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 91/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 1,878 elements for 1,679 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 45/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 2 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • The response at azoom.jp is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 28/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    49 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 39/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 33/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 3 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 51/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/30/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 50/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    43 of 97 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 54/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 54/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1,679 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited PropTech / Real Estate sites

Other PropTech / Real Estate sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.