Kuroma Kuroma

hsworking.com scores 61/100 for AI Readiness

奈良市・大和西大寺のコワーキングスペース｜貸し会議室・個室ブース・AI活用相談 (hsworking.com) is a PropTech / Real Estate site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 61/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (77) and its weakest is Authority Signals (41); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 9/100 (3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: LocalBusiness, WebSite, WebPage, Organization, ProfessionalService). That places it in the top quartile of the 394 PropTech / Real Estate sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://hsworking.com

61/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in PropTech / Real Estate Median 40 · Top quartile 45 · across 394 audited sites in PropTech / Real Estate

Is hsworking.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: hsworking.com scores 61/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 65
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 77
Authority Signals 25% of the score 41
AI Readiness 30% of the score 63

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.1 pts

    On https://hsworking.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +4.5 pts

    On https://hsworking.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 50/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.1 pts

    On https://hsworking.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://hsworking.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.1 pts

    On https://hsworking.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 76/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 2 of 84 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 36 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 89/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1141 words, 111 paragraphs, 8 lists, 43 images (43 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 73/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 10 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: LocalBusiness, WebSite, WebPage, Organization, ProfessionalService

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 87/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 14, H3: 14. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 51/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 17 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("ChatGPT Image 2026年6月12日 22_59_24.png", "ChatGPT Image 2026年6月12日 21_44_05_edited.jpg", "ChatGPT Image 2026年8月15日 19_29_21 (2).png") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 6 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("LINEで予約", "Line", "note_edited").
    • 34 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 43 images but only ~1141 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 56/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (4924ms). 4 render-blocking resources. 1964 elements for 1141 words

    • Server response was slow (4924ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 40 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 76/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 2 of 84 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 50/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Social profiles (5)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 57/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    6 of 29 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 60/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 5/21/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 42/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    5 of 105 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 75/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 75/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1141 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for PropTech / Real Estate · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai