Kuroma Kuroma

mercureyokosuka.jp scores 45/100 for AI Readiness

Mercure Yokosuka (mercureyokosuka.jp) is a Travel / Hospitality site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 45/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (73) and its weakest is Authority Signals (23); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,681 Travel / Hospitality sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://mercureyokosuka.jp

45/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Trust & Brand Signals: it scored 20/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 7.2 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Top 25% in Travel / Hospitality Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,681 audited sites in Travel / Hospitality

Is mercureyokosuka.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: mercureyokosuka.jp scores 45/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 48
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 73
Authority Signals 25% of the score 23
AI Readiness 30% of the score 41

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add Trust Signals up to +7.2 pts

    On https://mercureyokosuka.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 20/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://mercureyokosuka.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://mercureyokosuka.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.3 pts

    On https://mercureyokosuka.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 10/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://mercureyokosuka.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 83/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 768 words, 28 paragraphs, 14 lists, 27 images (25 with alt text)

    • Content length (768 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 2 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, LodgingBusiness

  • AI Readability Score Pass 84/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 4, H3: 2. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 40/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 of 27 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 23 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Mercure Yokosuka", "globe", "language").
    • 21 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 27 images but only ~768 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 43/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (7053ms). 13 render-blocking resources. 634 elements for 768 words

    • Server response was slow (7053ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 13 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 83/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 8 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 14 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 14 of 91 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 10/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 20/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Legal notice, Social profiles (2)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 65/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    5 of 8 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 70/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/31/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 67 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 43/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 43/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    768 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Travel / Hospitality sites

Other Travel / Hospitality sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.