astellas.com scores 44/100 for AI Readiness
astellas.com is a Pharma / Biotech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 44/100 (grade C), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (30); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 25 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 446 Pharma / Biotech sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://astellas.com
The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 30/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 6.3 points off the overall score.
Top 25% in Pharma / Biotech Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 446 audited sites in Pharma / Biotech
Is astellas.com ready for AI search?
Partly: astellas.com scores 44/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add External Citations & References up to +6.3 pts
On https://astellas.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 30/100
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
- Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts
On https://astellas.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6 pts
On https://astellas.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 14/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts
On https://astellas.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.6 pts
On https://astellas.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 10/100
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
- Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1,312 words, 36 paragraphs, 63 lists, 13 images (11 with alt text)
- 2 images missing alt text
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
4.5% of the overall score
No JSON-LD structured data found
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 25 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
3% of the overall score
Average 9 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 0, H2: 2, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.
- Missing H1 heading
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 2 of 13 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Company Logo").
- 9 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
27 render-blocking resources. 1,786 elements for 1,312 words
- 27 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 5 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 15 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 15 of 176 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 4/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. Has references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (2)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
6 of 10 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
7.5% of the overall score
1 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
0 of 66 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 51/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none
- This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Pharma / Biotech sites
- Strand Life Sciences (strandls.com) · 64/100
- 宇津救命丸株式会社 (uzukyumeigan.co.jp) · 58/100
- 第一三共株式会社 (daiichisankyo.co.jp) · 56/100
- 台灣神隆股份有限公司 (scinopharm.com.tw) · 53/100
- オンチップ (on-chip.co.jp) · 53/100
- アッヴィ合同会社 (abbvie.co.jp) · 52/100
Other Pharma / Biotech sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.