Kuroma Kuroma

astellas.com scores 44/100 for AI Readiness

astellas.com is a Pharma / Biotech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 44/100 (grade C), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (30); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 25 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 446 Pharma / Biotech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://astellas.com

44/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 30/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 6.3 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in Pharma / Biotech Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 446 audited sites in Pharma / Biotech

Is astellas.com ready for AI search?

Partly: astellas.com scores 44/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 44
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 34
AI Readiness 30% of the score 30

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +6.3 pts

    On https://astellas.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 30/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://astellas.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6 pts

    On https://astellas.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 14/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://astellas.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.6 pts

    On https://astellas.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 10/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,312 words, 36 paragraphs, 63 lists, 13 images (11 with alt text)

    • 2 images missing alt text
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 25 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 61/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 2, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 48/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 of 13 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Company Logo").
    • 9 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    27 render-blocking resources. 1,786 elements for 1,312 words

    • 27 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 5 responsive images

  • 13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 15 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 15 of 176 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 14/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. Has references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 54/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 48/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    6 of 10 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • 5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 66 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 51/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 51/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Pharma / Biotech sites

Other Pharma / Biotech sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.