Kuroma Kuroma

www.rohto.co.jp scores 49/100 for AI Readiness

ROHTO Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (www.rohto.co.jp) is a Pharma / Biotech site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 49/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (68) and its weakest is Authority Signals (37); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 446 Pharma / Biotech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.rohto.co.jp

49/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.5 points off the overall score.

Updated 4 days ago

Top 25% in Pharma / Biotech Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 446 audited sites in Pharma / Biotech

Is www.rohto.co.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: www.rohto.co.jp scores 49/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Improve Raw HTML Availability.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 54
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 68
Authority Signals 25% of the score 37
AI Readiness 30% of the score 43

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.rohto.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://www.rohto.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add Trust Signals up to +5.6 pts

    On https://www.rohto.co.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 38/100

    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://www.rohto.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5 pts

    On https://www.rohto.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 28/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 87/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,038 words, 89 paragraphs, 25 lists, 41 images (39 with alt text)

    • 2 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 49/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 1, H3: 5. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 48/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 13 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("PDF", "PDF", "PDF").
    • 20 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 39 images but only ~1,038 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    13 render-blocking resources. 944 elements for 1,038 words

    • 13 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 5 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 70/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. No robots.txt, so nothing blocks AI crawlers. 7 placeholder links

    • 7 of 188 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 28/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 14/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    33 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 38/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (5)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 46/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    3 of 7 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/15/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 30/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    6 of 94 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 61/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 61/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Pharma / Biotech sites

Other Pharma / Biotech sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.