Kuroma Kuroma

sansan.com scores 46/100 for AI Readiness

sansan.com is a SaaS / Cloud Software site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 46/100 (grade C), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (52) and its weakest is AI Readiness (40); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 189 SaaS / Cloud Software sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://sansan.com

46/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

Updated 4 days ago

Below the median in SaaS / Cloud Software Median 47 · Top quartile 54 · across 189 audited sites in SaaS / Cloud Software

Is sansan.com ready for AI search?

Partly: sansan.com scores 46/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 41
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 52
Authority Signals 25% of the score 52
AI Readiness 30% of the score 40

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://sansan.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 56 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at sansan.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 25 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://sansan.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://sansan.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5 pts

    On https://sansan.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 29/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +4.2 pts

    On https://sansan.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 27/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 72/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 455 words, 12 paragraphs, 3 lists, 36 images (34 with alt text)

    • Content length (455 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 2 images missing alt text (e.g. /assets/images/top_company_img01.webp, /assets/images/icon_mail.svg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 83/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 7. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 42/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 of 36 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("icon") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 25 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("sansan", "icon link", "icon link").
    • 17 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    17 render-blocking resources. 389 elements for 455 words

    • 17 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 56 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at sansan.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 29/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 68/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 57/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 14 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 27/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 10/21/2023

    • No recent year references in content
    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 20/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 48 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 71/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 71/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    455 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited SaaS / Cloud Software sites

Other SaaS / Cloud Software sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.