Kuroma Kuroma

semrush.com scores 54/100 for AI Readiness

Semrush: Your Unfair Advantage for Growing Brand Visibility (semrush.com) is a MarTech / Marketing Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 54/100 (grade B), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is AI Readiness (33); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://semrush.com

54/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated 10 days ago

Is semrush.com ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: semrush.com scores 54/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 51
Technical Optimization 80
Authority Signals 62
AI Readiness 33

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 91/100

    Found: 1315 words, 44 paragraphs, 24 lists, 1 tables, 54 images (34 with alt text)

    • 20 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Partial 60/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Corporation

  • AI Readability Score Partial 67/100

    Average 18 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 64/100

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 34. Hierarchy issues.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 25/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 20 of 54 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 25 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Shopify", "Decathlon", "Booking.com").
    • 28 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 54 images but only ~1315 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 43/100

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (4329ms). 19 render-blocking resources. 1097 elements for 1315 words

    • Server response was slow (4329ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 19 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    Has viewport. 33 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 81/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 145 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 74/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 7/10. Trust: 20/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 58/100

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 58/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 55/100

    2 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 2 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 1 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    0 of 76 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1315 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for MarTech / Marketing Platform · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai