Kuroma Kuroma

www.tryprofound.com scores 38/100 for AI Readiness

Profound (www.tryprofound.com) is a MarTech / Marketing Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 38/100 (grade D), audited 28 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (61) and its weakest is Authority Signals (26); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 272 MarTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.tryprofound.com

38/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 25/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 6.8 points off the overall score.

This audit is 18 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 18 days ago

Below the median in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 59 · across 272 audited sites in MarTech

Is www.tryprofound.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.tryprofound.com scores 38/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 37
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 61
Authority Signals 25% of the score 26
AI Readiness 30% of the score 34

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +6.8 pts

    On https://www.tryprofound.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 25/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://www.tryprofound.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.tryprofound.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +6.4 pts

    On https://www.tryprofound.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 29/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://www.tryprofound.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • 3 of 97 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.tryprofound.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 50 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.tryprofound.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 67/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 394 words, 92 paragraphs, 1 lists, 16 images (16 with alt text)

    • Content length (394 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 77/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Agents", "Items Sidebar", "Details Sidebar").
    • 15 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 16 images but only ~394 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 59/100

    2% of the overall score

    6 render-blocking resources. 986 elements for 394 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 16 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 3 placeholder links

    • 3 of 97 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.tryprofound.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 23/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 25/100

    9% of the overall score

    4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 29/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Contact, Social profiles (2)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 59/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 13 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 1 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 37 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 68/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    394 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited MarTech / Marketing Platform sites

Other MarTech / Marketing Platform sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.