Kuroma Kuroma

stackadapt.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

AI Advertising Platform (stackadapt.com) is a AdTech / Advertising site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is On-Page Content (51); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 8 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 138 AdTech / Advertising sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://stackadapt.com

64/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Unique Value Proposition: it scored 9/100 on a check worth 5.1% of the total, which takes 4.6 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in AdTech / Advertising Median 41 · Top quartile 49 · across 138 audited sites in AdTech / Advertising

Is stackadapt.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: stackadapt.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 51
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 80
Authority Signals 25% of the score 74
AI Readiness 30% of the score 55

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.6 pts

    On https://stackadapt.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 9/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://stackadapt.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 8 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.3 pts

    On https://stackadapt.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 34/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.2 pts

    On https://stackadapt.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 40/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://stackadapt.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1255 words, 129 paragraphs, 12 lists, 46 images (41 with alt text)

    • 5 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 34/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 8 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 66/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 12, H3: 33. Hierarchy issues.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 of 46 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 14 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("stackadapt logo", "Conversion on-demand", "cosette_logo").
    • 15 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 46 images but only ~1255 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 44/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (4198ms). 8 render-blocking resources. 1537 elements for 1255 words

    • Server response was slow (4198ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 19 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 86/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 40/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 11/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Pass 100/100

    9% of the overall score

    10 external links, 5 citation phrases, 6 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 75/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 58/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 49 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 3 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/12/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 9/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 80 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1255 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited AdTech / Advertising sites

Other AdTech / Advertising sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.