Kuroma Kuroma

www.medfirst.com.tw scores 42/100 for AI Readiness

杏一健康生活館 (www.medfirst.com.tw) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 42/100 (grade D), audited 22 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (84) and its weakest is Authority Signals (31); the biggest single gap is Heading Hierarchy at 0/100 (Missing H1 heading).

Audited URL: https://www.medfirst.com.tw/?lang=zh-TW

42/100
Grade
D

This audit is 56 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 56 days ago

Is www.medfirst.com.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.medfirst.com.tw scores 42/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 32
Technical Optimization 84
Authority Signals 31
AI Readiness 31

The 16 checks this audit confirms it scored

Every check this audit confirms it scored, with what it found on the page. 3 other checks are listed without a share of the score, because this audit cannot confirm whether they counted on this page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 62/100

    Found: 295 words, 2 paragraphs, 31 lists, 186 images (185 with alt text)

    • Content length (295 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 1 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: LocalBusiness

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    Average 5 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 0/100

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 32/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 186 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 185 images have generic or filename-only alt text (e.g. "image", "chart", a filename) that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 186 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 186 images but only ~295 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    25 external links, 3 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 31/100

    Present: SSL, Social Links

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 20/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 55/100

    References current year

    • No article publish/modified dates in metadata
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 10/100

    1 unique value phrases, 0 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.

    • No case studies or concrete examples found
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 60/100

    Score: 60/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Partial 70/100

    295 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.