Kuroma Kuroma

ksigp.com scores 49/100 for AI Readiness

KSI (ksigp.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 49/100 (grade C), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (69) and its weakest is AI Readiness (36); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar).

Audited URL: https://ksigp.com

49/100
Grade
C

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is ksigp.com ready for AI search?

Partly: ksigp.com scores 49/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 49
Technical Optimization 69
Authority Signals 50
AI Readiness 36

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 84/100

    Found: 832 words, 29 paragraphs, 5 lists, 112 images (111 with alt text)

    • Content length (832 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 1 images missing alt text (e.g. /images/your-privacy-choice.webp)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 23/100

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 8 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 91/100

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 11. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 36/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 96 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("HKICPA", "ACCA", "AICPA").
    • 98 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 111 images but only ~832 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 49/100

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 7/10. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 2 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 58/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 40/100

    1 definitions, 1 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 1 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 12/100

    1 of 51 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 78/100

    Score: 78/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    832 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.