Kuroma Kuroma

lime-technologies.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

Software and services for better customer journeys (lime-technologies.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (78) and its weakest is AI Readiness (56); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 16/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://lime-technologies.com

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 37/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 4.4 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is lime-technologies.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: lime-technologies.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 62
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 78
Authority Signals 25% of the score 60
AI Readiness 30% of the score 56

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.4 pts

    On https://lime-technologies.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 37/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://lime-technologies.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.1 pts

    On https://lime-technologies.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 19/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.8 pts

    On https://lime-technologies.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 16/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.1 pts

    On https://lime-technologies.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 76/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 5 of 133 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 72 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 87/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1792 words, 137 paragraphs, 10 lists, 120 images (13 with alt text)

    • 107 images missing alt text (e.g. /wp-content/polylang/da_DK.svg, /wp-content/polylang/de_DE.svg, /wp-content/polylang/en_GB.svg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 57/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 80/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 19, H3: 21. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 38/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 107 of 120 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 74 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 120 images but only ~1792 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    16 render-blocking resources. 1730 elements for 1792 words

    • 16 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 89 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 76/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 5 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 5 of 133 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 37/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 84/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 65/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    11 of 54 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 62/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 65/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 8/14/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 19/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 121 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 48/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 48/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1792 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.