Kuroma Kuroma

uool.io scores 45/100 for AI Readiness

uool.io is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 45/100 (grade C), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (67) and its weakest is AI Readiness (30); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.).

Audited URL: https://Uool.io

45/100
Grade
C

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is uool.io ready for AI search?

Partly: uool.io scores 45/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Improve Raw HTML Availability and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 67
Technical Optimization 59
Authority Signals 31
AI Readiness 30

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 79/100

    Found: 587 words, 23 paragraphs, 6 lists, 3 images (3 with alt text)

    • Content length (587 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 71/100

    FAQ section found (no schema). 12 question headings. 4 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 18. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 55/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 2 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 30/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    4 render-blocking resources. 552 elements for 587 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    Has viewport. 3 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 49/100

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 8 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 8 of 23 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 11/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    2 external links, 0 citation phrases, 6 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 43/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 38/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    0 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 16/100

    2 of 62 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.