Kuroma Kuroma

goso.io scores 71/100 for AI Readiness

GOSO (goso.io) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 71/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (85) and its weakest is AI Readiness (62); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 5/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://goso.io

71/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 5/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.4 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is goso.io ready for AI search?

Largely yes: goso.io scores 71/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Update Content Freshness and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 76
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 85
Authority Signals 25% of the score 67
AI Readiness 30% of the score 62

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +5.4 pts

    On https://goso.io · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 5/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://goso.io · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.6 pts

    On https://goso.io · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 49/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.2 pts

    On https://goso.io · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 30/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://goso.io · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2118 words, 63 paragraphs, 9 lists, 1 tables, 67 images (67 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 87/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 3 question headings. 4 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 16, H3: 10. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 34/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 53 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Property Entrepreneur", "San Miguel", "Playboy").
    • 8 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 67 images but only ~2118 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
    • 4 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    2 render-blocking resources. 1555 elements for 2118 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • 3 of 118 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 49/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 10/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    32 external links, 0 citation phrases, 56 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 77/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (6)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 93/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    16 of 30 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 3 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 5/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 79/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    31 of 175 passages carry a figure, 9 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2118 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.