Kuroma Kuroma

alone.tw scores 22/100 for AI Readiness

Alone / Ming (alone.tw) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 22/100 (grade F), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (56) and its weakest is AI Readiness (2); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://alone.tw

22/100
Grade
F

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is alone.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: alone.tw scores 22/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 20
Technical Optimization 56
Authority Signals 21
AI Readiness 2

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Fail 16/100

    Found: 32 words, 1 paragraphs, 1 images (1 with alt text)

    • Content length (32 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 35/100

    H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Insufficient section headings to break the content up
  • Media Accessibility Partial 50/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 23/100

    Present: SSL, Social Links

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 0/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    0 of 3 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 0/100

    Score: 0/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Needs work 30/100

    32 words readable without JavaScript

    • Only 32 words are readable without JavaScript; AI crawlers run no JavaScript and will see very little of this page.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.