Kuroma Kuroma

chainladder-python.readthedocs.io scores 35/100 for AI Readiness

chainladder-python.readthedocs.io is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 35/100 (grade D), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (70) and its weakest is AI Readiness (18); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://chainladder-python.readthedocs.io/stable/intro.html

35/100
Grade
D

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is chainladder-python.readthedocs.io ready for AI search?

Not yet: chainladder-python.readthedocs.io scores 35/100 (grade D). Start with Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 35
Technical Optimization 70
Authority Signals 28
AI Readiness 18

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 63/100

    Found: 412 words, 11 paragraphs, 18 lists, 2 images (2 with alt text)

    • Content length (412 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 79/100

    Average 14 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 35/100

    H1: 2, H2: 0, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
    • Insufficient section headings to break the content up
  • Media Accessibility Pass 75/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 31/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 40/100

    4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 15/100

    Present: SSL

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 20/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    0 of 12 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 85/100

    Score: 85/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    412 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.