Kuroma Kuroma

calendar.google.com scores 37/100 for AI Readiness

calendar.google.com is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 37/100 (grade D), audited 19 Jun 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (52) and its weakest is Authority Signals (29); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No JSON-LD structured data found).

Audited URL: https://calendar.google.com/calendar

37/100
Grade
D

This audit is 89 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 89 days ago

Is calendar.google.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: calendar.google.com scores 37/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 31
Technical Optimization 52
Authority Signals 29
AI Readiness 37

The 15 checks this audit confirms it scored

Every check this audit confirms it scored, with what it found on the page. 4 other checks are listed without a share of the score, because this audit cannot confirm whether they counted on this page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 64/100

    Found: 2287 words, 4 paragraphs, 1 lists, 1 images (1 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    Not counted on every kind of page or in every language, and this audit recorded neither this page’s type nor its language, so its share of the score is left out

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No JSON-LD structured data found
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 1 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 30/100

    H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
  • Media Accessibility Not measured

    Not counted on every kind of page, and this audit did not record this page’s type, so its share of the score is left out

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 20/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    0 external links, 125 citation phrases, 45 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 20/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 12/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 42/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 35/100

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No article publish/modified dates in metadata
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 45/100

    3 unique value phrases, 6 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.

    • No case studies or concrete examples found
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 36/100

    Score: 36/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Not measured

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.