www.dottedsign.com scores 48/100 for AI Readiness
eSignature Solution for Seamless Workflows (www.dottedsign.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 48/100 (grade C), audited 10 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (74) and its weakest is Authority Signals (41); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose). That places it above the median of the 3,298 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://www.dottedsign.com
The most points to recover are in Trust & Brand Signals: it scored 37/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 5.7 points off the overall score.
This audit is 22 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Above the median in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,298 audited sites in Technology
Is www.dottedsign.com ready for AI search?
Partly: www.dottedsign.com scores 48/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add Trust Signals up to +5.7 pts
On https://www.dottedsign.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 37/100
- No privacy policy link found
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
- Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
- Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
- Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts
On https://www.dottedsign.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.1 pts
On https://www.dottedsign.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 27/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.9 pts
On https://www.dottedsign.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 25/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Update Content Freshness up to +4.7 pts
On https://www.dottedsign.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 18/100
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 586 words, 25 paragraphs, 91 images (91 with alt text)
- Content length (586 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- Limited use of lists for scannable content
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
4.5% of the overall score
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, SoftwareApplication
- No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
-
3% of the overall score
Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 10. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 74 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("ds-logo", "menu-button", "image-dottedsign-banner").
- 26 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 91 images but only ~586 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
2 render-blocking resources. 554 elements for 586 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 7 responsive images. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links
- 1 of 26 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 15/25. Trust: 4/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 10 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Social profiles (1)
- No privacy policy link found
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
6 of 21 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References last year
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
6 of 63 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 16/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
586 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Technology sites
- Software Development Company (pharosproduction.com) · 88/100
- Neo Genesis (NeoGenesis) (neogenesis.app) · 75/100
- GetWidget (getwidget.dev) · 74/100
- PURIST (purist.online) · 74/100
- Hire Flutter Developers (hireflutterdev.com) · 72/100
- Hire Senior Python & AI Engineers (uvik.net) · 72/100
Other Technology sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.