Kuroma Kuroma

tennistopia.hk scores 49/100 for AI Readiness

Tennistopia Indoor auto tennis (tennistopia.hk) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 49/100 (grade C), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (75) and its weakest is AI Readiness (33); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 7/100 (No author attribution found).

Audited URL: https://Tennistopia.hk

49/100
Grade
C

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is tennistopia.hk ready for AI search?

Partly: tennistopia.hk scores 49/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 56
Technical Optimization 75
Authority Signals 39
AI Readiness 33

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 66/100

    Found: 450 words, 59 paragraphs, 6 lists, 18 images (9 with alt text)

    • Content length (450 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 9 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 22/100

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: LocalBusiness, WebSite, ItemList

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 73/100

    H1: 2, H2: 3, H3: 10. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 9 of 18 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 5 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("auto tennis club-02.png", "auto tennis club-02white.png", "tennistopia_wideshot1_edited.jpg") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 4 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Instagram", "Facebook", "Instagram").
    • 15 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 7/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 17 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 48/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Social Links

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 20/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 18/100

    References last year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 45/100

    8 of 44 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    450 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.