Kuroma Kuroma

spiralscout.com scores 70/100 for AI Readiness

Spiral Scout (spiralscout.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 70/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is AI Readiness (62); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 20/100 (2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://spiralscout.com

70/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 32/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.1 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is spiralscout.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: spiralscout.com scores 70/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 77
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 80
Authority Signals 25% of the score 66
AI Readiness 30% of the score 62

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.1 pts

    On https://spiralscout.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 32/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://spiralscout.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.6 pts

    On https://spiralscout.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.5 pts

    On https://spiralscout.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 31/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.5 pts

    On https://spiralscout.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 64/100

    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1972 words, 52 paragraphs, 24 lists, 84 images (75 with alt text)

    • 9 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 92/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 9 question headings. 5 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 94/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 85/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 43. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 36/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 9 of 75 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 43 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Qualcomm Logo", "Qualcomm Logo", "Found Logo").
    • 37 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 75 images but only ~1972 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    32 render-blocking resources. 1451 elements for 1972 words

    • 32 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 39 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 83/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 6 placeholder links

    • 6 of 137 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 64/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 4/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    12 external links, 0 citation phrases, 9 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 79/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 80/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    14 of 54 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 32/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 9 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/29/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 31/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    4 of 142 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 62/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 62/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1972 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.