Kuroma Kuroma

en.nagoya-u.ac.jp scores 60/100 for AI Readiness

Nagoya University (en.nagoya-u.ac.jp) is a Other site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 60/100 (grade A), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (88) and its weakest is Authority Signals (49); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 5/100 (No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check). That places it in the top quartile of the 425 Other sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://en.nagoya-u.ac.jp

60/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 6/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.1 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in Other Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 425 audited sites in Other

Is en.nagoya-u.ac.jp ready for AI search?

Largely yes: en.nagoya-u.ac.jp scores 60/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 53
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 88
Authority Signals 25% of the score 49
AI Readiness 30% of the score 57

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://en.nagoya-u.ac.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.8 pts

    On https://en.nagoya-u.ac.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 31/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.8 pts

    On https://en.nagoya-u.ac.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 5/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +4.7 pts

    On https://en.nagoya-u.ac.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 48/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.4 pts

    On https://en.nagoya-u.ac.jp · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 25/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 96/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,697 words, 177 paragraphs, 35 lists, 82 images (77 with alt text)

    • 5 images missing alt text (e.g. /assets/img/components/Pages/index/PageIndexIntro/PageIndexLead/img-world-map.png, /assets/img/components/Pages/index/PageIndexSectionAcademics/img-scene-sp.webp, /assets/img/components/Pages/index/PageIndex…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 6/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 5. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 40/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 of 82 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 12 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Instagram", "Facebook", "X").
    • 65 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 82 images but only ~1,697 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 31/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    12 external links, 1 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 48/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 61/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    9 of 13 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 57/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    3 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/15/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 115 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 69/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1,697 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Other sites

Other Other sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.