Kuroma Kuroma

mexc.com scores 44/100 for AI Readiness

MEXC Exchange (mexc.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 44/100 (grade C), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (71) and its weakest is AI Readiness (36); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content).

Audited URL: https://mexc.com

44/100
Grade
C

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is mexc.com ready for AI search?

Partly: mexc.com scores 44/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 38
Technical Optimization 71
Authority Signals 39
AI Readiness 36

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Needs work 48/100

    Found: 296 words, 6 lists, 15 images (4 with alt text)

    • Content length (296 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 11 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 28/100

    FAQ section found (no schema). 0 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 68/100

    H1: 0, H2: 6, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Fail 13/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 9 of 13 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("logo", "logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Certik", "Elliptic").
    • 5 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 62/100

    3 render-blocking resources. 1280 elements for 296 words

    • The page spends 1280 HTML elements on 296 words of content, so crawlers parse far more markup than answer
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    Has viewport. 2 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 1 of 24 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 35/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 25/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 60/100

    2 external links, 1 citation phrases, 14 statistics. Has references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 20/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 38/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    0 original data indicators, 4 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 71/100

    6 of 38 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 36/100

    Score: 36/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Partial 70/100

    296 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.