Kuroma Kuroma

lokalise.com scores 58/100 for AI Readiness

World-class AI localization platform (lokalise.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 58/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (66) and its weakest is AI Readiness (49); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 19/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://lokalise.com

58/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 53/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 6.1 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is lokalise.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: lokalise.com scores 58/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 54
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 66
Authority Signals 25% of the score 66
AI Readiness 30% of the score 49

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://lokalise.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • 6 of 115 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at lokalise.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 76 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at lokalise.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://lokalise.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.3 pts

    On https://lokalise.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 19/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://lokalise.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.7 pts

    On https://lokalise.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 27/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 92/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1347 words, 132 paragraphs, 16 lists, 73 images (73 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 19/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 32/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, BreadcrumbList, WebPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 58/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 80/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 3, H2: 12, H3: 18. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (3) - should have exactly one
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 47/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 22 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Lokalise_logo_black.svg", "soc2-badge-2x.webp", "iso27001-badge-2x.webp") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 24 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("life360 logo", "pleo logo", "coachhub logo").
    • 19 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 73 images but only ~1347 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 1279 elements for 1347 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 73 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 6 placeholder links

    • 6 of 115 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at lokalise.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 70/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 6 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 75/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (6)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 50/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    12 of 33 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 74/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/14/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 27/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    4 of 99 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 78/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 78/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1347 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.