Kuroma Kuroma

feedme.mipos.my scores 52/100 for AI Readiness

FeedMe POS × MIPOS ShopTech (feedme.mipos.my) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 52/100 (grade B), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (73) and its weakest is AI Readiness (43); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics).

Audited URL: https://feedme.mipos.my

52/100
Grade
B

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is feedme.mipos.my ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: feedme.mipos.my scores 52/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Increase Citation-Worthy Content and Fix Schema Markup Issues.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 73
Technical Optimization 47
Authority Signals 47
AI Readiness 43

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    Found: 1309 words, 31 paragraphs, 4 lists, 1 tables, 17 images (17 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 43/100

    No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Partial 60/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 90/100

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 90/100

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 12. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 56/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Sunmi V3", "Selected Device").
    • 16 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 20/100

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    4 render-blocking resources. 735 elements for 1309 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    Has viewport. 12 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 30/100

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 20 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 20 of 35 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 6/25. Authority: 4/10. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 13 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 55/100

    Present: SSL, Contact, Social Links

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 63/100

    0 definitions, 1 ordered lists, 1 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 62/100

    9 of 115 passages carry a figure, 3 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1309 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.