Kuroma Kuroma

skilwi.ai scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

skilwi.ai is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (73) and its weakest is Authority Signals (55); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 13/100 (3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: SoftwareApplication, Organization, FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://skilwi.ai

64/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 45/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is skilwi.ai ready for AI search?

Largely yes: skilwi.ai scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 67
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 73
Authority Signals 25% of the score 55
AI Readiness 30% of the score 63

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +5 pts

    On https://skilwi.ai · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 45/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.2 pts

    On https://skilwi.ai · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 40/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://skilwi.ai · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://skilwi.ai · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of
    • Break enumerable points into a list of three or more items rather than a run-on paragraph
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.8 pts

    On https://skilwi.ai · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 71/100

    • 10 of 48 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • This page opens 24 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 92/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1872 words, 13 paragraphs, 1 tables, 15 images (15 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 62/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: SoftwareApplication, Organization, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 2. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 52/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 11 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("SKILWI.ai", "Candidate Matching", "Career Paths").
    • 12 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 860 elements for 1872 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 71/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 10 placeholder links

    • 10 of 48 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 40/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 45/100

    9% of the overall score

    4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 25 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 76/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (1)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 91/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 12 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 9 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 70/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    13 of 164 passages carry a figure, 9 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 58/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 58/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1872 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.