Kuroma Kuroma

decomp.dev scores 38/100 for AI Readiness

decomp.dev is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 38/100 (grade D), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (47) and its weakest is Authority Signals (31); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://Decomp.dev

38/100
Grade
D

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is decomp.dev ready for AI search?

Not yet: decomp.dev scores 38/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 36
Technical Optimization 47
Authority Signals 31
AI Readiness 38

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 82/100

    Found: 1761 words, 4 lists, 122 images (122 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 20/100

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 143. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 29 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Vagrant Story", "God Hand", "Fatal Frame").
    • 122 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 122 images but only ~1761 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 91/100

    1 render-blocking resources. 2519 elements for 1761 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    Has viewport. 122 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 27/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. 6 AI crawler(s) blocked: OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, Meta-WebIndexer, Amzn-SearchBot. 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 6 AI visibility crawler(s) blocked in robots.txt: OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, Meta-WebIndexer, Amzn-SearchBot. Blocking these removes the site from the corresponding AI engines' answers.
    • Informational: ChatGPT-User, Perplexity-User blocked in robots.txt. These tokens cover on-demand user fetches and platforms may not apply robots.txt to those requests; reported for information, not scored.
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 7/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    148 external links, 2 citation phrases, 229 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 15/100

    Present: SSL

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 20/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    0 original data indicators, 229 percentages, 1 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 5/100

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 79/100

    86 of 295 passages carry a figure, 74 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 36/100

    Score: 36/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1761 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.