Kuroma
hankchiu.tw scores 31/100 for AI Readiness
Hank Chiu (hankchiu.tw) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 31/100 (grade F), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is Authority Signals (14); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).
Audited URL: https://hankchiu.tw
This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is hankchiu.tw ready for AI search?
Not yet: hankchiu.tw scores 31/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
The 18 checks scored on this page
Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 1 more check was not scored on this page and is listed below with no score.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 206 words, 10 paragraphs
- Content length (206 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- Limited use of lists for scannable content
-
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite
- No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
-
Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.
-
Media Accessibility Not applicable
Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category
Not scored on this page: no images, video or audio to make readable
Technical Optimization
-
1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
1 render-blocking resources. 159 elements for 206 words
-
Has viewport. has theme-color
-
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links
- 2 of 22 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals
-
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
2 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
Present: SSL, Social Links
- No privacy policy link found
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
References current year
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
0 of 26 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
Score: 85/100
-
206 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Technology sites
- Software Development Company (pharosproduction.com) · 88/100
- Neo Genesis (NeoGenesis) (neogenesis.app) · 75/100
- GetWidget (getwidget.dev) · 74/100
- PURIST (purist.online) · 74/100
- Hire Flutter Developers (hireflutterdev.com) · 72/100
- Hire Senior Python & AI Engineers (uvik.net) · 72/100
Other Technology sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.