Kuroma Kuroma

frictionai.co scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

friction AI (frictionai.co) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Authority Signals (69) and its weakest is On-Page Content (59); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://frictionai.co

64/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 47/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 6.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is frictionai.co ready for AI search?

Largely yes: frictionai.co scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 59
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 62
Authority Signals 25% of the score 69
AI Readiness 30% of the score 64

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.9 pts

    On https://frictionai.co · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 47/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 2 of 46 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at frictionai.co is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 32 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://frictionai.co · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://frictionai.co · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.7 pts

    On https://frictionai.co · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 47/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +2.9 pts

    On https://frictionai.co · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 56/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 89/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1336 words, 43 paragraphs, 3 lists, 16 images (16 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 56/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 5 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, Review

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 58/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 11. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 12 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Friction", "ChatGPT", "Gemini").
    • 9 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    5 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    3 render-blocking resources. 710 elements for 1336 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 12 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 47/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 2 of 46 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at frictionai.co is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 47/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Pass 75/100

    9% of the overall score

    6 external links, 3 citation phrases, 21 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 81/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 66/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 22 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 21 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 82/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 5/28/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 60/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    7 of 82 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 5 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 78/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 78/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1336 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.