Kuroma Kuroma

wmie.it scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

wmie (wmie.it) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (72) and its weakest is Authority Signals (61); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://wmie.it

66/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 64/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 4.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is wmie.it ready for AI search?

Largely yes: wmie.it scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 68
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 72
Authority Signals 25% of the score 61
AI Readiness 30% of the score 66

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.7 pts

    On https://wmie.it · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 64/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 7 of 47 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 14 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.6 pts

    On https://wmie.it · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 38/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://wmie.it · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.8 pts

    On https://wmie.it · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 46/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +3.2 pts

    On https://wmie.it · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 65/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 80/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2926 words, 67 paragraphs, 4 lists, 4 images (0 with alt text)

    • 4 images missing alt text (e.g. /illustrations/homepage-dashboard.svg, /illustrations/homepage-revenue-impact.svg, /illustrations/homepage-decision-makers.svg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 85/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 30 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, ProfessionalService, WebPage, FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 13 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 29. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Pass 86/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    1 render-blocking resources. 1012 elements for 2926 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 64/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 7 of 47 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 46/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    8 external links, 1 citation phrases, 19 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 68/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 86/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    15 of 40 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 38/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 19 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 44/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    8 of 121 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 73/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 73/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2926 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.