Kuroma Kuroma

adina.com scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

ADINA (adina.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (73) and its weakest is AI Readiness (56); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 24 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://adina.com

64/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is adina.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: adina.com scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 73
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 69
Authority Signals 25% of the score 59
AI Readiness 30% of the score 56

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://adina.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://adina.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://adina.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 24 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.2 pts

    On https://adina.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 68/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 30 of 320 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 51 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.9 pts

    On https://adina.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 24/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3421 words, 296 paragraphs, 36 lists, 9 images (7 with alt text)

    • 2 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 95/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 6 question headings. 4 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, Organization, Person, WebPage, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 24 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 93/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 14 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 84/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 10, H3: 3. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 60/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 of 9 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("loading").
    • 3 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    85 render-blocking resources. 3071 elements for 3421 words

    • 85 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 68/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 30 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 30 of 320 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 54/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    181 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 79/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 85/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    9 of 23 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 89/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 4/1/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 24/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 214 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 96/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 96/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3421 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.