Kuroma Kuroma

reply.io scores 69/100 for AI Readiness

reply.io is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (81) and its weakest is AI Readiness (64); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://reply.io

69/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 30/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.3 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is reply.io ready for AI search?

Largely yes: reply.io scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Improve Raw HTML Availability and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 67
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 81
Authority Signals 25% of the score 68
AI Readiness 30% of the score 64

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://reply.io · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://reply.io · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +3.9 pts

    On https://reply.io · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 40/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +2.5 pts

    On https://reply.io · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 45/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.5 pts

    On https://reply.io · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 65/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3641 words, 98 paragraphs, 52 lists, 112 images (99 with alt text)

    • 13 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 40/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 86/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 17. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 37/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 13 of 112 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 40 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("logo", "logo", "image") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 47 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Agencies", "b2b_ic", "audsug_ic").
    • 30 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 53/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (4910ms). 7 render-blocking resources. 2605 elements for 3641 words

    • Server response was slow (4910ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 41 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • 4 of 144 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 65/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 25/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    26 external links, 0 citation phrases, 63 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 82/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 72/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    26 of 78 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 15 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/19/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 79/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    29 of 282 passages carry a figure, 7 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 74/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 74/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.