Kuroma Kuroma

simplelaw.com scores 41/100 for AI Readiness

SimpleLaw (simplelaw.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 41/100 (grade D), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (65) and its weakest is AI Readiness (31); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://simplelaw.com

41/100
Grade
D

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is simplelaw.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: simplelaw.com scores 41/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 39
Technical Optimization 65
Authority Signals 37
AI Readiness 31

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 84/100

    Found: 830 words, 34 paragraphs, 10 lists, 29 images (28 with alt text)

    • Content length (830 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 1 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    Average 12 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 97/100

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 3. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 34/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 29 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 19 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("SimpleLaw-logo-color-tagline_500px", "Customization", "icons8-padlock-64").
    • 12 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 29 images but only ~830 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 30/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 44/100

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3188ms). 8 render-blocking resources. 831 elements for 830 words

    • Server response was slow (3188ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 83/100

    Has viewport. 12 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 66/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 18/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 55/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 35/100

    1 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    0 of 54 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 85/100

    Score: 85/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    830 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.