Kuroma Kuroma

tcrf.net scores 41/100 for AI Readiness

The Cutting Room Floor (tcrf.net) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 41/100 (grade D), audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (59) and its weakest is Authority Signals (26); the biggest single gap is AI Discoverability at 0/100 (Score: 0/100).

Audited URL: https://Tcrf.net

41/100
Grade
D

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is tcrf.net ready for AI search?

Not yet: tcrf.net scores 41/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Optimize Mobile Experience.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 59
Technical Optimization 52
Authority Signals 26
AI Readiness 30

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 79/100

    Found: 755 words, 11 paragraphs, 15 lists, 10 images (10 with alt text)

    • Content length (755 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 28/100

    FAQ section found (no schema). 0 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 89/100

    Average 12 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 2. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 57/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("DeusEx-PreReleaseImageHellsKitchenSewers.jpg", "Blinx-SoundTest.png") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 2 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 20/100

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2 render-blocking resources. 364 elements for 755 words

  • Mobile Optimization Needs work 35/100

    Missing viewport. 3 responsive images

    • Missing viewport meta tag
  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 4 of 120 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 17/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 2 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 15/100

    Present: SSL

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 53/100

    2 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 24/100

    2 of 36 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 0/100

    Score: 0/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    755 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.