Kuroma Kuroma

gigster.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

Software Development Services (gigster.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (84) and its weakest is AI Readiness (51); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 9/100 (2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://gigster.com

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 22/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is gigster.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: gigster.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 55
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 84
Authority Signals 25% of the score 68
AI Readiness 30% of the score 51

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts

    On https://gigster.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.1 pts

    On https://gigster.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +3.6 pts

    On https://gigster.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 30/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
    • Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +3.2 pts

    On https://gigster.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 65/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +2.7 pts

    On https://gigster.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 59/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 72/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1418 words, 2 paragraphs, 8 lists, 64 images (49 with alt text)

    • 15 images missing alt text (e.g. , , )
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 59/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 14 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 72/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 42. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 42/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 15 of 64 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 12 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("...", "Google logo", "Microsoft logo").
    • 34 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 64 images but only ~1418 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    15 render-blocking resources. 1160 elements for 1418 words

    • 15 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • 4 of 118 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 63/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 10/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    9 external links, 1 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 76/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 75/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    14 of 74 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 57/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 10/5/2024

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 30/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    4 of 100 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 62/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 62/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1418 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.