Kuroma Kuroma

obama.or.jp scores 55/100 for AI Readiness

Obama Onsen Ryokan Association Official Website (obama.or.jp) is a Travel / Hospitality site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 55/100 (grade B), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is Authority Signals (44); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 1,681 Travel / Hospitality sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://obama.or.jp

55/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.5 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in Travel / Hospitality Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1,681 audited sites in Travel / Hospitality

Is obama.or.jp ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: obama.or.jp scores 55/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 46
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 44
AI Readiness 30% of the score 56

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://obama.or.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.7 pts

    On https://obama.or.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 18/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://obama.or.jp · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://obama.or.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://obama.or.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2,100 words, 18 paragraphs, 10 lists, 1 tables, 39 images (19 with alt text)

    • 20 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 7 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 79/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 15, H3: 20. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 37/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 20 of 39 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("IMG_8250") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 14 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("zh-CN", "zh-TW", "en").
    • 23 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    67 render-blocking resources. 1,781 elements for 2,100 words

    • 67 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 21 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 79/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 11 placeholder links

    • 11 of 82 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 18/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 14/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    8 external links, 0 citation phrases, 18 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 54/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)

    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 68/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    17 of 35 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 1 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 61/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 3/9/2026

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 57/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    18 of 130 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Travel / Hospitality sites

Other Travel / Hospitality sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.