Kuroma Kuroma

enea.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

AI-Powered Software for Telecom Networks & Cybersecurity (enea.com) is a Technology site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (84) and its weakest is AI Readiness (54); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 9/100 (1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Article, WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, Person). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://enea.com

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 40/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 4.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology

Is enea.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: enea.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 61
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 84
Authority Signals 25% of the score 57
AI Readiness 30% of the score 54

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://enea.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.2 pts

    On https://enea.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 53/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.1 pts

    On https://enea.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4 pts

    On https://enea.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 21/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.7 pts

    On https://enea.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 47/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2011 words, 50 paragraphs, 42 lists, 38 images (23 with alt text)

    • 15 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 55/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 5 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Article, WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, Person

  • AI Readability Score Partial 68/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 17 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • 1 sentences exceed 25 words
  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 93/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 11, H3: 4. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 45/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 15 of 38 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 7 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("en", "en", "MWC 2027").
    • 26 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    33 render-blocking resources. 1268 elements for 2011 words

    • 33 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 29 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 86/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 47/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 53/100

    9% of the overall score

    9 external links, 1 citation phrases, 2 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 69/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 71/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    10 of 34 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 15 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 55/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 8/19/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 21/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 114 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2011 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Technology sites

Other Technology sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.