www.yinhou.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 35/100
飲后 Yinhou (www.yinhou.com.tw) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 35/100(D 級),檢測日期 2026 年 10 月 15 日。 表現最強的是技術(50 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(22 分);最大的單一缺口是問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否,0/100(No FAQ schema markup detected)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 31,080 個網站 中,這個分數低於中位數。
檢測網址: https://www.yinhou.com.tw
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是可爬取性與可存取性:這項占總分 13%,只拿到 34/100,讓總分少了 8.6 分。
這次檢測距今已 15 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。
在所有受測網站中低於中位數 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 31,080 個受測網站
www.yinhou.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
還沒有:www.yinhou.com.tw 的實測分數為 35/100(D 級)。 先從這裡開始: Add FAQ Schema Markup、Make This Page’s Facts Extractable。
類別分數
優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access 最多可 +8.6 分
位於 https://www.yinhou.com.tw · 技術 → 可爬取性與可存取性, 得分 34/100
- 38 of 65 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at www.yinhou.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
- This page opens 11 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
- Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.yinhou.com.tw — the response we received could not be parsed as one
-
Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers 最多可 +7.2 分
位於 https://www.yinhou.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 答案框潛力, 得分 0/100
- No passage an assistant could quote whole
- No FAQ structure detected
- Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
- Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
- Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +7 分
位於 https://www.yinhou.com.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 0/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup 最多可 +6.5 分
位於 https://www.yinhou.com.tw · 頁面內容 → 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否, 得分 0/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Update Content Freshness 最多可 +5.7 分
位於 https://www.yinhou.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 內容新鮮度, 得分 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 541 words, 21 paragraphs, 21 lists, 32 images (12 with alt text)
- Content length (541 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- 20 images missing alt text
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
占總分 4.5%
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization
-
占總分 3%
Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.
- No headings a reader can see
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 20 of 32 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 26 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 32 images but only ~541 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
8 render-blocking resources. 978 elements for 541 words
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport. 14 responsive images
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 38 placeholder links
- 38 of 65 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at www.yinhou.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
占總分 9%
9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 9 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
0 of 0 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No passage an assistant could quote whole
- No FAQ structure detected
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
占總分 5.7%
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
占總分 5.1%
0 of 48 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
占總分 3%
Score: 17/100
-
占總分 1.5%
541 words readable without JavaScript
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 →