Kuroma Kuroma

www.dihua-halfday.com 的 AI Readiness 實測 42/100

迪化半日 (www.dihua-halfday.com) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 42/100（D 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 22 日。 表現最強的是技術（57 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（33 分）；最大的單一缺口是問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否，0/100（No FAQ schema markup detected）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中，這個分數高於中位數。

檢測網址: https://www.dihua-halfday.com

42/100
等級
D

能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是可爬取性與可存取性：這項占總分 13%，只拿到 44/100，讓總分少了 7.3 分。

這次檢測距今已 23 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變，現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。

23 天前更新

在所有受測網站中高於中位數 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站

www.dihua-halfday.com 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

還沒有：www.dihua-halfday.com 的實測分數為 42/100（D 級）。 先從這裡開始： Add FAQ Schema Markup、Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals。

類別分數

頁面內容 占總分 25% 41
技術 占總分 20% 57
權威性 占總分 25% 40
AI 就緒度 占總分 30% 33

優先修正項目（依可挽回的分數排序）

排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差，因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正，不一定是分數最低的檢查。

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access 最多可 +7.3 分

    位於 https://www.dihua-halfday.com · 技術 → 可爬取性與可存取性, 得分 44/100

    • 33 of 115 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.dihua-halfday.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 47 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.dihua-halfday.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +7 分

    位於 https://www.dihua-halfday.com · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup 最多可 +6.5 分

    位於 https://www.dihua-halfday.com · 頁面內容 → 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否, 得分 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Update Content Freshness 最多可 +5.7 分

    位於 https://www.dihua-halfday.com · AI 就緒度 → 內容新鮮度, 得分 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +5.1 分

    位於 https://www.dihua-halfday.com · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

全部 19 項評分檢查

公開評分標準的每一項檢查，以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。

頁面內容 占總分 25%

  • 內容深度與完整性 部分符合 74/100

    占總分 6.5%

    Found: 880 words, 60 paragraphs, 33 lists, 33 images (19 with alt text)

    • Content length (880 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 14 images missing alt text)
  • 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否 未通過 0/100

    占總分 6.5%

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 結構化資料品質 待改善 30/100

    占總分 4.5%

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization

  • AI 可讀性分數 通過 94/100

    占總分 3%

    Average 7 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • 標題階層 未通過 15/100

    占總分 2.8%

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Insufficient section headings to break the content up
  • 媒體無障礙性 待改善 45/100

    占總分 1.8%

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 14 of 33 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 31 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 33 images but only ~880 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
    • 7 image(s) load only via JavaScript (lazy/data-src), and most AI crawlers run no JavaScript and never see them.

技術 占總分 20%

  • Schema 標記完整性 通過 90/100

    占總分 1%

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 頁面效能指標 通過 81/100

    占總分 2%

    4 render-blocking resources. 1095 elements for 880 words

  • 行動裝置優化 通過 77/100

    占總分 4%

    Has viewport. 7 responsive images

  • 可爬取性與可存取性 待改善 44/100

    占總分 13%

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 33 placeholder links

    • 33 of 115 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.dihua-halfday.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

權威性 占總分 25%

  • E-E-A-T 訊號 未通過 0/100

    占總分 7%

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 外部引用與參考來源 部分符合 55/100

    占總分 9%

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 9 statistics. No references section.

  • 信任與品牌訊號 部分符合 56/100

    占總分 9%

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (2)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI 就緒度 占總分 30%

  • 答案框潛力 待改善 34/100

    占總分 7.2%

    1 of 1 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • 值得被引用度 部分符合 60/100

    占總分 7.5%

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • 內容新鮮度 未通過 0/100

    占總分 5.7%

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • 獨特價值主張 未通過 0/100

    占總分 5.1%

    0 of 50 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI 可發現性 未檢測 52/100

    占總分 3%

    Score: 52/100

  • 原始 HTML 可用性 通過 100/100

    占總分 1.5%

    880 words readable without JavaScript

本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度：AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡（提及、評論、第三方報導），而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌；Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單