Kuroma
www.adidas.com.tw scores 49/100 for AI Readiness
adidas台灣官方購物網站 (www.adidas.com.tw) scores 49/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 21 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (86) and its weakest is On-Page Content (33); the biggest single gap is Heading Hierarchy at 0/100 (Missing H1 heading).
Audited URL: https://www.adidas.com.tw/
This audit is 57 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is www.adidas.com.tw ready for AI search?
Partly: www.adidas.com.tw scores 49/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup.
Category scores
This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
The 16 checks this audit confirms it scored
Every check this audit confirms it scored, with what it found on the page. 3 other checks are listed without a share of the score, because this audit cannot confirm whether they counted on this page.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 580 words, 1 paragraphs, 23 lists, 43 images (39 with alt text)
- Content length (580 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- 4 images missing alt text
-
Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: LocalBusiness
-
Average 3 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.
- Missing H1 heading
- Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
-
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 4 of 43 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 39 images have generic or filename-only alt text (e.g. "image", "chart", a filename) that tells AI nothing about the content.
- 43 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 43 images but only ~580 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization
-
1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
Fetch succeeded with an acceptable response time
-
Has viewport. 17 responsive images
-
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. 2 placeholder links
Authority Signals
-
Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out
Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
7 external links, 14 citation phrases, 10 statistics. No references section.
-
Present: SSL, Social Links
- No privacy policy link found
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables
- No FAQ structure detected
-
Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out
0 original data indicators, 8 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
References current year
- No article publish/modified dates in metadata
-
0 unique value phrases, 0 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.
- No case studies or concrete examples found
-
Score: 60/100
-
580 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card