the-w.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 53/100
威楓設計 (the-w.com.tw) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 53/100(B 級),檢測日期 2026 年 9 月 7 日。 表現最強的是技術(70 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(40 分);最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質,0/100(No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中,這個分數排在前四分之一。
檢測網址: https://the-w.com.tw
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是值得被引用度:這項占總分 7.5%,只拿到 20/100,讓總分少了 6 分。
這次檢測距今已 7 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。
在所有受測網站中排前 25% 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站
the-w.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
大致可以,仍有缺口:the-w.com.tw 的實測分數為 53/100(B 級)。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Improve Unique Value Proposition。
類別分數
優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +6 分
位於 https://the-w.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 20/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add External Citations & References 最多可 +5.9 分
位於 https://the-w.com.tw · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 35/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
- Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +5 分
位於 https://the-w.com.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 28/100
- No author attribution found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access 最多可 +4.6 分
位於 https://the-w.com.tw · 技術 → 可爬取性與可存取性, 得分 65/100
- 11 of 35 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …
- This page opens 15 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +4.6 分
位於 https://the-w.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 10/100
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
- Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 1,192 words, 35 paragraphs, 4 lists, 18 images (17 with alt text)
- 1 images missing alt text
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 6 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
占總分 4.5%
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Place, Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, LocalBusiness
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
占總分 3%
Average 11 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 0, H2: 5, H3: 9. Hierarchy issues.
- Missing H1 heading
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 1 of 18 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
75 render-blocking resources. 861 elements for 1,192 words
- 75 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport. 14 responsive images
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 11 placeholder links
- 11 of 35 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 14/25
- No author attribution found
-
占總分 9%
7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Contact, Social profiles (3)
- No privacy policy link found
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
7 of 18 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 1 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
占總分 5.7%
References current year. Last modified: 8/25/2026
-
占總分 5.1%
0 of 53 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
占總分 3%
Score: 49/100
-
占總分 1.5%
This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none
- This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單