Kuroma Kuroma

the-w.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 53/100

威楓設計 (the-w.com.tw) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 53/100(B 級),檢測日期 2026 年 9 月 7 日。 表現最強的是技術(70 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(40 分);最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質,0/100(No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中,這個分數排在前四分之一。

檢測網址: https://the-w.com.tw

53/100
等級
B

能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是值得被引用度:這項占總分 7.5%,只拿到 20/100,讓總分少了 6 分。

這次檢測距今已 7 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。

7 天前更新

在所有受測網站中排前 25% 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站

the-w.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?

大致可以,仍有缺口:the-w.com.tw 的實測分數為 53/100(B 級)。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Improve Unique Value Proposition。

類別分數

頁面內容 占總分 25% 66
技術 占總分 20% 70
權威性 占總分 25% 42
AI 就緒度 占總分 30% 40

優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)

排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +6 分

    位於 https://the-w.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References 最多可 +5.9 分

    位於 https://the-w.com.tw · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +5 分

    位於 https://the-w.com.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 28/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access 最多可 +4.6 分

    位於 https://the-w.com.tw · 技術 → 可爬取性與可存取性, 得分 65/100

    • 11 of 35 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …
    • This page opens 15 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +4.6 分

    位於 https://the-w.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 10/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

全部 19 項評分檢查

公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。

頁面內容 占總分 25%

  • 內容深度與完整性 通過 89/100

    占總分 6.5%

    Found: 1,192 words, 35 paragraphs, 4 lists, 18 images (17 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text
  • 占總分 6.5%

    No FAQ structure. 6 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • 結構化資料品質 未通過 0/100

    占總分 4.5%

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Place, Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, LocalBusiness

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI 可讀性分數 通過 95/100

    占總分 3%

    Average 11 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • 標題階層 部分符合 59/100

    占總分 2.8%

    H1: 0, H2: 5, H3: 9. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • 媒體無障礙性 通過 85/100

    占總分 1.8%

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 18 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

技術 占總分 20%

  • Schema 標記完整性 通過 100/100

    占總分 1%

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 頁面效能指標 部分符合 60/100

    占總分 2%

    75 render-blocking resources. 861 elements for 1,192 words

    • 75 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • 行動裝置優化 通過 85/100

    占總分 4%

    Has viewport. 14 responsive images

  • 可爬取性與可存取性 部分符合 65/100

    占總分 13%

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 11 placeholder links

    • 11 of 35 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …

權威性 占總分 25%

  • E-E-A-T 訊號 待改善 28/100

    占總分 7%

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 14/25

    • No author attribution found
  • 外部引用與參考來源 待改善 35/100

    占總分 9%

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • 信任與品牌訊號 部分符合 60/100

    占總分 9%

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Contact, Social profiles (3)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI 就緒度 占總分 30%

  • 答案框潛力 待改善 49/100

    占總分 7.2%

    7 of 18 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • 值得被引用度 未通過 20/100

    占總分 7.5%

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 1 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • 內容新鮮度 通過 85/100

    占總分 5.7%

    References current year. Last modified: 8/25/2026

  • 獨特價值主張 未通過 10/100

    占總分 5.1%

    0 of 53 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI 可發現性 未檢測 49/100

    占總分 3%

    Score: 49/100

  • 原始 HTML 可用性 未通過 10/100

    占總分 1.5%

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單