Kuroma Kuroma

atinlp.com 的 AI Readiness 實測 47/100

首頁 (atinlp.com) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 47/100(C 級),檢測日期 2026 年 9 月 3 日。 表現最強的是技術(59 分),最弱的是權威性(33 分);最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質,0/100(No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中,這個分數排在前四分之一。

檢測網址: https://atinlp.com

47/100
等級
C

能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是可爬取性與可存取性:這項占總分 13%,只拿到 53/100,讓總分少了 6.1 分。

這次檢測距今已 11 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。

11 天前更新

在所有受測網站中排前 25% 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站

atinlp.com 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?

部分準備好:atinlp.com 的實測分數為 47/100(C 級)。 最該先做的兩件事是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Improve Unique Value Proposition。

類別分數

頁面內容 占總分 25% 53
技術 占總分 20% 59
權威性 占總分 25% 33
AI 就緒度 占總分 30% 46

優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)

排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access 最多可 +6.1 分

    位於 https://atinlp.com · 技術 → 可爬取性與可存取性, 得分 53/100

    • 5 of 38 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing
    • This page opens 17 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • robots.txt asks crawlers to wait 20s between requests, which limits how much of this site they reach
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +6.1 分

    位於 https://atinlp.com · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add External Citations & References 最多可 +5.9 分

    位於 https://atinlp.com · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +5.1 分

    位於 https://atinlp.com · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Add Trust Signals 最多可 +4.9 分

    位於 https://atinlp.com · 權威性 → 信任與品牌訊號, 得分 46/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Your Organization schema declares 3 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)

全部 19 項評分檢查

公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。

頁面內容 占總分 25%

  • 內容深度與完整性 通過 78/100

    占總分 6.5%

    Found: 2,955 words, 66 paragraphs, 3 lists, 11 images (0 with alt text)

    • 11 images missing alt text
  • 占總分 6.5%

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 結構化資料品質 未通過 0/100

    占總分 4.5%

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI 可讀性分數 通過 86/100

    占總分 3%

    Average 19 words/sentence. 38 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • 標題階層 通過 92/100

    占總分 2.8%

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • 媒體無障礙性 未通過 22/100

    占總分 1.8%

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 11 of 11 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 10 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 3 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

技術 占總分 20%

  • Schema 標記完整性 通過 100/100

    占總分 1%

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 頁面效能指標 部分符合 60/100

    占總分 2%

    70 render-blocking resources. 1,086 elements for 2,955 words

    • 70 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • 行動裝置優化 部分符合 70/100

    占總分 4%

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • 可爬取性與可存取性 部分符合 53/100

    占總分 13%

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 5 placeholder links

    • 5 of 38 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

權威性 占總分 25%

  • E-E-A-T 訊號 未通過 13/100

    占總分 7%

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • 外部引用與參考來源 待改善 35/100

    占總分 9%

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • 信任與品牌訊號 待改善 46/100

    占總分 9%

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Social profiles (4)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI 就緒度 占總分 30%

  • 答案框潛力 部分符合 50/100

    占總分 7.2%

    11 of 27 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • 值得被引用度 待改善 40/100

    占總分 7.5%

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • 內容新鮮度 通過 79/100

    占總分 5.7%

    References current year. Last modified: 4/3/2026

  • 獨特價值主張 未通過 0/100

    占總分 5.1%

    0 of 118 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI 可發現性 未檢測 81/100

    占總分 3%

    Score: 81/100

  • 原始 HTML 可用性 未通過 10/100

    占總分 1.5%

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單