Kuroma
www.onedollar.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 44/100
一元麻將 (www.onedollar.com.tw) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 44/100（C 級），檢測日期 2026 年 10 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（80 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（23 分）；最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質，0/100（No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 31,080 個網站 中，這個分數高於中位數。
檢測網址: https://www.onedollar.com.tw
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是值得被引用度：這項占總分 7.5%，只拿到 0/100，讓總分少了 7.5 分。
這次檢測距今已 9 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變，現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。
在所有受測網站中高於中位數 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 31,080 個受測網站
www.onedollar.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？
部分準備好：www.onedollar.com.tw 的實測分數為 44/100（C 級）。 最該先做的兩件事是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Add FAQ Schema Markup。
類別分數
優先修正項目（依可挽回的分數排序）
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差，因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正，不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +7.5 分
位於 https://www.onedollar.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 0/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +6.1 分
位於 https://www.onedollar.com.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 13/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add External Citations & References 最多可 +5.9 分
位於 https://www.onedollar.com.tw · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 35/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
- Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
-
Update Content Freshness 最多可 +5.7 分
位於 https://www.onedollar.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 內容新鮮度, 得分 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +5.1 分
位於 https://www.onedollar.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 0/100
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
- Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查，以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 545 words, 25 paragraphs, 5 lists, 8 images (6 with alt text)
- Content length (545 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- 2 images missing alt text (e.g. /line-brand-icon-128-v3.webp, /line-brand-icon-128-v3.webp)
-
占總分 6.5%
FAQ section found (no schema). 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
占總分 4.5%
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, Brand, WebSite, SoftwareApplication
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
占總分 3%
Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 1, H2: 3, H3: 6. Proper hierarchy.
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("一元麻將").
- 3 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
3 render-blocking resources. 310 elements for 545 words
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport. 3 responsive images
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links
- 3 of 54 links cannot be followed by a crawler
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
占總分 9%
8 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Social profiles (3)
- No privacy policy link found
- No contact information easily accessible
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
3 of 10 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
占總分 5.7%
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
占總分 5.1%
0 of 44 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
占總分 3%
Score: 85/100
-
占總分 1.5%
This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none
- This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度：AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡（提及、評論、第三方報導），而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌；Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單